Court of Appeal rules in contractors' favour
A TV presenter won a high-profile Upper Tribunal case regarding her employment status under the IR35 rules. HMRC appealed against this, but the Court of Appeal has just rejected its argument. What happened?

HMRC’s argument was that the Upper Tribunal had interpreted a key piece of case law incorrectly. The case in question sets out the factors that should be considered, such as mutuality of obligation, personal service and others. HMRC argued that whether someone is “in business on their own account” (i.e. other factors) should be given little weight, and even argued that considering this would be an onerous compliance burden for HMRC. In a decision published today, the Court of Appeal unanimously rejected this argument, stating that circumstances known to both parties at the date of the contract, e.g. the fact that the person providing the work has an established career as a freelance worker, should be taken into account. This is a huge win for all contractors, particularly those providing personal services.
The decision on whether, overall, there would have existed an employment relationship in this case was remitted back to the Upper Tribunal.
Related Topics
-
How much will you save with reduced scale charges?
HMRC has reduced the VAT fuel scale charge by nearly 6% for company-provided cars. When does the new reduced rate take effect and how do you make the calculations?
-
Avoid the trading allowance trap
In late 2024 you became self-employed. You’re now completing your tax return for 2024/25 and will claim the trading allowance instead of a tax deduction for business expenses. Could this impact your NI record and state pension entitlement?
-
Time off for fertility treatment?
A survey by Fertility Matters at Work has revealed that more than one-third of employees undergoing fertility treatment have resigned or are considering resigning because of the physical and emotional toll. Is there a right to time off for fertility treatment?